Feminists Continue to Distort History in order to Advance an Anti-Male Ideology

The latest example comes courtesy of Marxist and feminist Naomi Wolf. The thesis of her latest book is that Occidental Culture has a history of violently censoring differing forms of love in order to preserve the supposedly oppressive patriarchy. (When reading differing forms of love, understand that this is feminist double-speak, meaning fornication, adultery, homosexuality and other forms of sexual deviancy.) There’s just one problem: it’s all based on a gross misreading of history.

When Conservatives Unjustifiably Rebuke Biblical Christians

The reader may or may not know the name Israel Folau. I certainly didn’t until a few days ago. He’s a professional rugby player who’s suddenly been deemed unfit for employment. His violation? He posted a message for adulterers, homosexuals, thieves, atheists and the like through his Instagram account: repent, believe in Christ and be saved from Hellfire. If the reader is well versed in the modern socio-political scene, he will accurately presume that such a message wasn’t well received by the militant-homo-lobby and its vanguard. However, what if I were to tell you, dear reader, that another unexpected group also proceeded to rebuke Folau for simply communicating Biblical Truth – namely, conservatives – would you believe me?

Irony Fail: Homosexual Mayor Pete Buttigieg Lectures Christians on Hypocrisy

During a segment on NBC’s Meet the Fake Press with Chuck Todd, militant sodomite, mayor of South Bend, Indiana and, unbeknownst to me until now, Bible teacher Pete Buttigieg pontificated on why Biblical Christians ought to wear dunce hats for supporting Donald Trump during the 2016 election. It was a perfect display of absolute charlatanism, exceeded only by Satan’s failed attempt to tempt Christ. An explanation is in order.

Podcast: Continuing our Examination of How Homosexuality was Normalized in the West

Important Note: After we finished the livestream, we were informed by YouTube that the second half of the video version of the podcast has been blocked due to a copyright claim by iTV, the network that transmits Good Morning Britain. We believe this claim to be suspicious in nature, due to the fact that we are not making money from the clip and only used it for the purposes of commentary – a right reserved according to copyright law. We are disputing the block and are hoping that the video will be made available to the public soon. In the meantime, the audio version of the podcast is still available above, through the iTunes Store and through our account on SoundCloud.

Description: In this edition, we continue to examine how militant homosexuals achieved widespread acceptance of their depraved practices and how Christians can combat said tactics in order to protect their hearts and minds from such a subversive propaganda.

Intolerance is a Virtue

Historically, toleration has been understood to mean different things within two particular contexts – one personal and one political. In a personal sense, a tolerating person is said to be an individual that valiantly resists bad times and evil influences. In a political sense, toleration has meant that society as a whole permits ideological differences within itself with the implicit understanding that no harm should come to those that express differences of opinion. Both definitions have been contorted into a newfangled and pernicious notion that reeks of malicious intent.

The Tomi Lahren Debacle Proves that Many are Followers of Personalities and not Principles

At the outset, let’s address the caged cat: Ms. Lahren is heretically wrong on abortion and in contradicting her own statements on the matter proves she’s either a publicity-seeking opportunist or genuinely had a fascinatingly quick, Trump-like change of heart. I highly doubt the latter and I’ll explain why. But let’s scrutinize her recently announced posture on abortion first.

Beware! The Transgenders Are Coming!

Can anyone explain what a right is? I suggest we disallow any further activism ensuring any other special interest groups achieve the “rights” they continue to demand, until someone properly defines the meaning of the word.

Why does the reader think that most will not bother to ask the question or to define the term? Please remember that groups such as militant homosexuals and abortion-crazy feminists have used the expression inaccurately in order to achieve special privileges and consideration, not true equality (which they already had, under the law, to begin with). The very reason these demagogues do not bother to explain the term is because the definition contradicts the ends they seek.

I Tried to Warn You About Milo Yiannopoulos

I’ll say it again: Careful who you let in the door.

In the last piece I wrote, I alluded to the corrupting effect of allowing persons whom don’t assent to the tenets and traditions of Christianity and conservatism into the fold. I specifically mentioned Milo Yiannopoulos as an example, the recalcitrant homosexual who is a deviant and reprobate in his behavior and words. Yet, conservatives have made him part of the group because he’s supposed to be the antithesis to the Leftist talking point which says “conservatives hates gays” and because he facetiously fights against PC restrictions.

Proving my earlier point, now video has surfaced were Yiannopoulos vehemently defends pedophilia. Meanwhile, he was invited to speak at CPAC and the promulgation of said video is causing consternation within the ranks. I wonder what Breitbart, Steven Crowder and other conservative organizations and talking heads will have to say about this development, since many of them helped propel Yiannopoulos into the spotlight.

We’ve got to discern, people. We also can’t allow famous “leaders”, radio show hosts, podcast hosts and writers to do it for us either. They’re the ones who fed us this garbage because they didn’t use the proper filters. Of could it be that they knew and tried to repress it?

Careful Who You Let In the Door

The apostle Paul wrote that “a little leaven leavens the whole lump”. (Galatians 5:9; 1 Corinthians 5:6) In appealing to the Judaic symbolism for sin, leaven, Paul warns us to beware of tolerating subtle and seemingly harmless influences which can corrupt our walk with Christ.

One wishes, in certain instances, to be able to lead the horse to water and make him drink as well. I allude to the old saying because too many Christians haven’t heeded Paul’s advice. Their willful ignorance and non-compliance with the sacred text has resulted in devastation.